Herbert Graf wrote:
> Very neat, not being x86 based will certainly present a barrier to
> adoption by the masses, but for many it might be fine. I suppose we'll
> see if this sort of idea will catch on.
> 
> TTYL
> 

I feel like not being x86 isn't nearly as much of a burden as it once
was probably mainly because of linux. I remember the Acorn Risc machine
that used an ARM - came out in 1994, the only thing you could run on it
was "RISC OS". Today you could run Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, etc. Also,
most people are happy "these days" if it runs Firefox and Flash.

-
Martin
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist