Thank you,

I think it's better if we close this topic.

Olin Lathrop escreveu:
> Eoin Ross wrote:
>   =

>> You have established this its a redistribution in binary form - no
>> arguement.
>>
>> What about this at the end of that statement?
>> "in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
>> distribution."
>>
>> No matter WHAT you send to me (redistribution) ... you are going to
>> have to include certain text in some accessable method. A PIC/LED
>> flasher can't do it - so you have to provide documentation with it.
>>
>> The melody card would have to have it somewhere - probably on the
>> back with the bar code. If you send the electronics to Hallmark for
>> them to use, you provide the documentation to them - and its on them
>> to take care of it for their redistribution step.
>>     =

>
> While this discussion about licenses is interesting in its own right, we
> seem to be loosing sight of the original intent.  If I remember right, the
> OP created heap routines for a PIC 16.  Most likely nobody would ever use
> them even if they were totally free.  Heap routines are of very limited u=
se
> on a PIC 16.  So far this requirement hasn't come up in 100 PIC projects,
> and I doubt it will come up in the next 100.  In the unexpected event I
> would need something like a heap on a PIC 16, it would never occur to me =
to
> look around for someone else's bugware that might implement working heap
> routines that might take less time to ensure really work than to write th=
em
> from scratch.
>
> Release them any way you want.  Nobody is going to care anyway.
>   =


__________________________________________________
Fa=E7a liga=E7=F5es para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger =

http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ =


-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist