On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 08:12:46PM -0400, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:52 AM, William Chops Westfield wrote: > > >>> 1) Anyone can use the library in their product without having to > >>> release their source. > >>> > >>> 2) Anyone that improves the library is required to release the > >>> improvements under the same license as the original library. > >>> > >>> Now technically the LGPL meets both of those requirements. > > LGPL does not work for many embedded application like > those using PICs. Bill cut off the rest of my message. Therein I explained the issue of he LGPL relink requirement and why it reverts to a situation where using the library means releasing the source for the application, violating issue #1 listed above. BAJ -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist