> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Apptech <apptech@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>> As this post is in [OT], how are you going to see the answers?
>> :-)

Xiaofan responded:

> I have put back [OT] now that it is quite clean. Maybe
> thanks to the creation of [TECH] which I do not turn on. ;-)

:-).

Thinking it through you may conclude, but may not, that it would be logical 
to deduce that OT will always on average be "less clean" than TECH. Part of 
the object of TECH was to rescue better quality technical but non EE 
material from the general swampiness of OT. OT goes through cycles and 
seasons and also it's quality at any time is, in part, in the mind of the 
perceiver. Quite why someone would want to view OT subject matter but bar 
themselves from more technical material is something of a mystery to me, but 
'it takes all kinds to make a world'. You and I are possibly good examples 
of the truth of that old saying :-). That which seems logical to you can be 
somewhat puzzling to me, and the opposite certainly seems to apply as well. 
In such matters there is no "right" attitude - just personal and different 
ones.



      Russell

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist