Forrest W Christian wrote:
> If you're into cheap, hobbyist C, you might want to try the MikroC.

BoostC never seems to get much attention.  IMO it's a higher-quality 
compiler than MikroC (much tighter output code) and costs less for a 
comparable license.  I haven't done head-to-head comparisons with other 
compilers, but I find it completely suitable for professional projects.

Cost is $5-$30-$70-$150, for varying capabilities.  Supports PIC16 and 
PIC18.  http://www.sourceboost.com/
-- 
Timothy J. Weber
http://timothyweber.org
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist