Bob Blick wrote:
> Does anyone else think Nabble is a net negative?
>
> Did anyone who is now subscribed to the piclist start posting from
> Nabble originally? Would you have subscribed without Nabble?
>
> Because I think Nabble has negatively impacted the piclist. Not bigtime,
> but a little bit.

Why is it "net negative"? Is this one of your attempts to make PicList a 
tightly policed private "PIC-only" club? ;)

I subscribed the "normal" way, but I find Nabble useful when searching 
PicList archives. Often when googling for something, I find the answer in a 
PicList post, courtesy of Nabble.

Vitaliy 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist