> >> Tony Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>> Go back a couple of messages.
> >> Your original statement was "Ethernet is dead" followed by
> >> Cat5/RJ45 networing is alive (in the same message)-- which is 
> >> contradictory.  You only changed your statement after 
> people called 
> >> you on it.
> >> 						Lee Jones
> > 
> > 
> > Right, and what's wrong with that?
> 
> What was wrong was that Ethernet isn't dead, of course.
> 
> And Cat5/RJ45 is also used for other communications then Ethernet.
> 
> Whatever...


Crikey, I appear to have not only discovered the 'Coax Appreciation
Society', but have them terribly as well.  Definitely a slow day.

The original point was 'stuff that used to plug into your PC but is now
considered old crap except by one or two diehards', in case anyone has
forgotten.  I note that no-one actually disagrees with me.

BTW, someone go and berate Sean for getting the grade of coax used by thick
ethernet wrong.  Then you can berate me again for agreeing with him.  In my
defence, I point out I've never actually used it, so what Sean said sounded
right (well, I knew RG-58 was right).  I've got a box of RG-58, anyone in
the C.A.S. want it?

Tony

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist