>
> There are several problems with this:
>
> 1) How is water a fuel here? It seems to me that you never need to add
> more water.
> 2) The step of splitting water into H2 and O2 takes MORE energy than
> you get when you recombine them to get water back. This manifests
> itself as heating of the water during electrolysis and is unavoidable.
> 3) On the one hand, you are saying that this ISN'T a closed cycle
> since you get useful work out of it, and yet you then claim that it is
> a closed cycle because you get the water from the beginning back again
> (i.e., it is not permanently changed into anything else).
>
> Sean
>
yes, absolutely agree your doubt, refer to :-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db1o48QyRJM
I heard about "fuel cell" in 2 months ago, I've more doubt ever. where is
the total energy from ? base on my understand, electrolysis is just a
"trigger" here please see carefully until finish this video, is 2 types of
chemical reaction, first: electrolysis, second: "metal" + HHO (ion state),
some kind of corrode impact, "metal" I can hear he said "aluminum", which
have live-span.
I still not understand the membrane that mansions in this video.
very interesting "fuel cell".

best regards
cllow2020
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist