Nope,,, sorry. You have the chance to do a "squint test" of the calibration every so often? If so perhaps a straight resistance value would be useful,,, I just know how much they change with almost any of the fertilizers. You're not using dc on the probe are you? At 08:02 PM 8/9/2008, you wrote: >I looked at those. The gypsum block sensors I'm finding are all like >$20 a pop. Way more than I want to spend for a piece of each sensor. > >If you can point me to a supply that is significantly cheaper, please >let me know! > >-Pete > >On Aug 9, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Grif w. keith griffith wrote: > > > > > gypsum block sensor. Change every few years. > > > > > > At 05:16 PM 8/8/2008, you wrote: > >> Pretty coarse is fine. The intended application is to remain in place > >> rather than being a portable probe. It is simply to provide some > >> information back to a sprinkler controller. Target is consumers > >> rather > >> than commercial/large ag organizations. > >> > >> Basically I need something equivalent to a 10 point scale: bone dry > >> to > >> waterlogged. > >> > >> -Pete > >> > >> On Aug 8, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Grif wrote: > >> > >>> resistance/conductivity and moisture content do not track well. I > >>> think with what I think I know, simple and cheap go together nicely, > >>> but reliably and accuracy may be a stretch. If the soil type can be > >>> characterised and stays stable,,, (like an orchard or vinyard over > >>> time), conductivity/resistance may infact work fine. If it's a > >>> portable unit, not sure you'll get to what you need. > >>> > >>> Units with good resolution seem to be tensioneters, that and his > >>> hands are all my brother trusts (ag guy). Not fast if I remember. > >>> The resistance ones seem to use a gypsum block encased resistance > >>> element to make sure none of the "other" stuff affects the > >>> resistance/ph around the sensor. > >>> > >>> Seems like the stablization time for any of the commercial ones I'm > >>> aware of is measured in hours, not seconds and minutes. > >>> > >>> What kind of accuracy do you need? > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Peter Loron > >>>> Sent: Aug 8, 2008 3:19 PM > >>>> To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." > >>>> Subject: [EE] Replacement for L4620 > >>>> > >>>> Can anybody point me to a replacement for the ST Micro L4620? > >>>> > >>>> http://www.allelectronics.com/mas_assets//spec/L4620.pdf > >>>> > >>>> I'm looking for a simple, cheap way to reliably measure soil > >>>> moisture, > >>>> and am thinking about using an oscillating probe to measure > >>>> resistance. This chip looks like it has everything I want all in > >>>> one > >>>> tidy bundle. > >>>> > >>>> Suggestions? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> -Pete > >>>> -- > >>>> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >>>> View/change your membership options at > >>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >>> View/change your membership options at > >>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> View/change your membership options at > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > > W. Keith 'Grif' Griffith > > N7IVS > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >-- >http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >View/change your membership options at >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist W. Keith 'Grif' Griffith N7IVS -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist