On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:04:56PM +1200, Apptech wrote: > >> You should get a copy of Skeptic magazine Vol.14 No.1 > >> 2008 and read the > >> article "The Hydrogen Economy" by Alice Friedemann. > > Paul said: > > The article is online here: > > http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/08-03-12.html > > You need to scroll down past a few ads to read it. > > Warning: Raving ranting opinion ahead. Please return to your > seats and fasten your belts. There is a bag in the pocket in > front of you. > > I looked through the article. > Then I gargoyled Alice Friedman and did some looking at what > she says and does. > She doesn't seem totally stupid. Doesn't seem totally > malicious. Does seem to care somewhat. > > But, the above article is utterly terrible. It contains much > truth, but it's interlaced with half truth, misuse, > overstatement, understatement exaggeration and more. While > it makes some good points I would not recommend it to anyone > as a balanced view. > > If she really is really convinced that Hydrogen is so bad, > and if she understands what she is talking about, then she > should present an objective and balanced assessment, fair > (or even just meaningful) comparisons, and show that she > knows what she is talking about. Otherwise people are liable > to just grimace and move on. She may perhaps get a few fence > sitters, and the choir are probably happy being preached to, > but as a fair analysis of the prose and cons it was > surprisingly and disturbingly lacking. Russell, could you comment on what you see as half-truths or mistakes in the article? On the issue of hydrogen, I know of only one positive aspect and that is the potential it has for being carbon neutral. I would willingly jump the fence when presented with a convincing argument. You've put a lot of thought into your opinion. Can you provide me with some references that have informed you? Matthew -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist