>
>
> No, I don't think that it would make sense even then. Hydrogen has  
> its uses,
> but replacing petroleum isn't one of them. The low volumetric  
> energy density
> is just one issue; I personally like my car to have a back seat area.
>
> You say that you're not a nuclear apologist, but I think that you  
> should
> become one and join me! (and others)
>
> Matthew

I am a nookie advocate ( not an apologist .... I am not sure what  
there is to apologize for ... the laws of physics being beyond my  
control ).  Do I understand that if the world could reduce the carbon  
footprint by *1,000 % that you would block the effort if it meant  
giving up your backseat ?
cc
* or even 53% ?
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist