Hi Russell,
I'd rate this one as OT. To me, TECH should have a more
electronic-technical content.

I can see the TECH angle - I just don't think it belongs.

I don't have a problem with it being OT.

Richard P

2008/7/20 cdb <colin@btech-online.co.uk>:
> I believe this becomes Tech once an electronic or mechanical gadget /
> process becomes apparent. Might be Tech or OT if a superduper
> programming algorithm is published that can crunch a billion smaples
> per second and the results used for medical or drug research.
>
> As a general discussion though, not relevant to the Piclist.
>
> Colin
>
> :::: Consider this a trial post of sorts.
> :::: I dithered over whether to use OT or TECH.
> :::: In some ways it's highly OT, and it's not about technology
> :::: in the mechanical sense, but it is very very much about the
> :::: use of science and technology to perform vast acts of human
> :::: engineering - both medical and social.
> --
> cdb, colin@btech-online.co.uk on 20/07/2008
>
> Web presence: www.btech-online.co.uk
>
> Hosted by:  www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=7988359
>
> Friendship multiplies the good of life and divides the evil.
> Baltasar Gracian
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist