Do you have support ( or know of support ) for your dongles if OS X or Linux is the desired operating system ? cc > > On Jul 19, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Vitaliy wrote: > > Olin Lathrop wrote: >>> http://www.BTDongles.com >>> >>> ... >>> >>> Your comments regarding the website and the products are welcome. >> >> I'm a bit confused. I thought you were making automotive >> products? This >> not only seems like a departure, it doesn't seem to be your company >> either. >> >> What market are you generally in and what is the web site for your >> company? > > Sorry for the confusion, Olin. > > The company name is ScanTool.net, LLC. Our core business is PC-based > automotive diagnostic scan tools, and our main website is > http://www.ScanTool.net. > > > In 2006, we felt that there may be a market for a short-range (~100 m) > wireless scan tool. After testing the waters with external adapters > (AIRCable, FireFly, etc) we realized that we need something that is > easier > to use, costs significantly less, and can be built into the scan tool. > Besides being bulky, the external adapters were routinely destroyed by > customers plugging them into the wrong cable (car battery voltage > across > data pins). > > Much effort was spent looking for an off-the-shelf Bluetooth module, > unfortunately the options available at the time were few, cost more > than the > external adapters, and did not have all of the features we needed. > In order > to meet the requirements (cost, size, features), our only choice > was to > build the module ourselves. The result was the STM4100. > > > Along the way, we found that the cheap USB to Bluetooth dongles > have several > major flaws: > > * They are not FCC compliant > * They rely on the BlueSoleil software for operation > * BlueSoleil software supplied with the dongles is pirated > > BlueSoleil was a support nightmare -- it doesn't work reliably, > installs two > dozen virtual COM ports, and is next to impossible to uninstall. So > after > much searching, we found a Class 1 FCC certified dongle that is > based on the > CSR chipset, supported natively by Windows XP and Vista, and is > super easy > to install. The downside is higher cost and MOQ. > > Since we are forced to buy/build more dongles and modules than we > need for > the short-term, it made sense to offer them for sale. ScanTool.net > website > is not the best vehicle to sell Bluetooth products, therefore it > was decided > that a new website was necessary, http://www.BTdongles.com. As an > added > bonus, it is being used as a test bed for a new shopping cart and > content > management system that all of our websites will soon be migrating to. > > > To add to the confusion, we also run another website, > http://www.OBD2Cables.com. The story is similar to BTdongles.com: > we needed > OBD cables, could not find a good source, and were forced to have them > custom built in large quantities. So in 2004 we built a website and > offered > the surplus cables to engineers and hobbyists. Single cable orders > were soon > followed by orders for 10,000 cables, and eventually the sales grew to > account for almost half of our total revenue. > > > I'm sorry for the long post, but I hope it helped to clear things up. > > Vitaliy -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist