I propose to consider new [ASP/SQL] tag on this list. Actually PIC based devices could serve as light web clients within ASP.NET/MS SQL applications. This kicks off huge market. Hope MCHP people will understand it not too late. For example, your know, here in "Texas" sized Inner Mongolia we would like to equip every camel with cheap Internet-over-GPRS enabled PIC-based mobile to report to California based web server about the current condition of the camel and its load. The "data logger" software on the server would report in real time about camel status, and would predict camel possible failure, so a herdsman would receive warning SMS and could care of the situation in timely manner. We have a good number of camels roaming around the desert. So the project seems to be quite big. Some good/gold level PIC professionals are on the list to consult with. And for ASP.NET/MS SQL part of the project we'd like to have consultants on the list too to keep the development consistent. So, again, why not new [ASP/SQL] tag on this list. Thanks. On 7/13/08, Dan Smith wrote: > I'd like to welcome Bob Blick and Russell to the admin team as list > moderators :-) > > We've set up another topic tag called [TECH] which Russell has agreed > to police (along with [OT]). Bob will be helping to police the [PIC] > and [EE] tags. This will allow us to refocus some of the other tags. > > ** Please note that if you want to receive [TECH] posts and you don't > receive the daily digest version of the Piclist, you will have to > visit and opt in. ** > > The new topic definitions effective immediately are: > > [PIC] > Should be at the start of the subject line for most postings to the > PICList. This says that a PIC microcontroller (or clone) is directly > involved, connected or the entire subject of the post. Any person who > works with PICs would want to read it... > > [SX] > Items specific to the Scenix SX microcontrollers > > [AVR] > Items specific to the Atmel AVR microcontrollers > > [ARM] > Items specific to ARM microcontrollers > > [EE] > The doing of Electrical/Electronic Engineering that you can do > yourself. Power stations go into TECH unless it's a power station that > you can build. So too eg Magnetohydrodynamics etc. Windmill > alternators and related systems and alternate energy at the doing > level go into EE. Windfarms into TECH. etc > > [TECH] > About technology, Engineering other than EE, science hard stuff. NOT > the philosophy of science in any depth. New discoveries in QM, > cosmology etc are fine. Almost anything that gets a long thread that > diverges can probably evolve into OT once people know it exists. Those > who care can follow it. eg Global Warming is TECH at the latest > discoveries level but not discussions of "An inconvenient truth" or > "The great global warming swindle" etc. This may rate an occasional > mention in TECH but long ramblings can go to OT. > > [BUY] > People looking for parts, equipment, or consultants will use this topic. > > [AD] > This is for advertisements of a commercial product or service. Don't > spam, do post [AD]! > > [OT] > This label is for posts that are completely off the topic of > engineering/technology. The only things we don't ever want to see are > religious/metaphysical, sex, hate, or political messages. > > Hopefully, these definitions are pretty clear, but if you have any > questions please ask away and the admin team will do our best to > answer :-) > > Dan > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist