>
> Do you have a project you'd be willing to share the code for that's not too
> big but no so small as to be trivial?  I might be interested in converting
> it to relocatable mode and my development environment as a demonstration.
> I'm not making any promises, but if there's code you're willing to make
> public you've got little to loose.
>

Hi Olin,

I would like to see this in action.  I find that your approach to
programming quickly distracts me from what I actually want the
processor to do.  When I am experimenting for some reason I often find
it easier if references and values are hard coded.  For example I I
tend to use the bit number to reference bits rather than by label then
try to tidy it up after.

However,I believe you approach is clearly superior and would like to
embrace it but at the moment it distracts me from the problem at hand.
 Someone once commented that you use so many macros that you have
forgoten what it is like to do real programming.  This was unfair but
helps highlight the increased difficulty due to introduced obscurity.

I am very keen to follow anything you have to say about using your
development environment and relocatable mode.  I know you are not
promising anything but I am putting up my hand.

If Jinx is unable to offer a project I have one that may be suitable
at www.pickledeye.com/pic/index.htm  3tc.zip contains the files and
3tc.pic is the main module.  It is for a 16f84 which may make it
unsuitable.

Cheers Justin
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist