Tom=E1s =D3 h=C9ilidhe wrote:

> =

> Dario Greggio wrote:
> =

>>Hmmm, if that device is going to be a "dongle", making it Ethernet will =

>>make it easier to "clone" i.e. any PC will be able to do that (sooner or =

>>later).
>>A USB slave is (much) more complicated to clone.
> =

> =

> How can they clone it if they haven't got access to the machine code of =

> the algorithm? (The machine code is run on the PIC)

If it is not a dongle, then (as I said) my question is pointless. I =

believed it was a "protection device", a key. If it creates a "result" - =

the algorhitm result, then this is different.

-- =

Ciao, Dario
-- =

http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist