Read this carefully, or not at all:

> Apptech wrote:
>> That answer will give people the impression that you 
>> haven't
>> tried to find out yourself, and that you expect other 
>> people
>> to spend their time doing for you what you could do for
>> yourself by looking at the data sheet.

> You are quite annoying...

Be that as it may, I assure you with certainty that if I did 
not gently annoy, the ones who would come after me would 
make the same points with boots violence arrogance and more.

I invite you to ***CAREFULLY*** read what I wrote again, and 
in context. See exactly what point it was that I was making 
and what I was trying to achieve.

As a starter, in the above, note the words "... will give 
people the impression ...". This is completely true. That is 
exactly what will happen. And some people who get such an 
impression haven't got enough creativity to wonder whether 
there may be more to it than that. So they just wade on in 
shouting abuse and abbreviations about copulation which they 
assume, incorrectly, makes it OK to say what is not nice to 
otherwise say. And in no time flat we are all yelling at 
each other.

Do note what I said in the bit that you deleted following 
what you quoted:

I said

> NOW    it may be that the impressions given are incorrect.
> And they may not be.

I find it, in turn, quite annoying that you would 
effectively misquote me by removing those words. The aim was 
to advise on the impression that was certainly being 
conveyed, BEFORE others said it in a far worse manner. FWIW.



        Russell


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist