> I just use table reads on the 18F series - you can get two bytes
> of data in the same space as a RETLW instruction and using the
> TABLTRU/H/L registers makes it nice and easy to read long
> strings

I think you're probably right. Had a quick play around and all
that messing with PCL isn't really worth it. Plus, as you say, a
table is much more efficient space-wise. It's what I do on other
18F projects with 100+ character AT strings

It would be nice though to have a generic macro that could call a
target RETLW routine by name, test/adjust PCL and pass W back
to the CALL routine. Maybe another day .....

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist