James Nick Sears wrote:
> I'm sure all the n00bs that get busted up in here have glanced in the
> general direction of the datasheet.

Unfortunately, all too often they haven't.  If they did, we wouldn't get
stupid questions like which pin RB1 was on, for example.

I don't understand why we have to keep rehashing this.  If someone asks a
dumb question that is clearly and directly answered in the datasheet right
where you'd expect to find it, I and Jan-Erik and Wouter and a bunch of
others will probably tell them to RTFM.  Complaining about us saying that is
totally pointless and a waste of time.  I don't care if you think it's right
or not, I'm going to continue to say RTFM when I think it's appropriate.  If
Russell and others can stop complaining about that, maybe I won't start
complaining to them whenever they answer such a question instead of teaching
the OP a lesson and telling him to RTFM.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
(978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist