Hi, Alan. I have noticed problems where the BOR is not working properly or is not used. Take a look there first. --Bob On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:07 PM, alan smith wrote: > Client has a 16F887 in a product,and they do limited runs of 20 or so at a > time. Maybe one out of the batch shows problems that allude to that the ram > locations are being corrupted, and perhaps even EEPROM locations. The value > in the ram is loading a timer and so when its bad....the timer is way off. > It loads from EEPROM, and so the code allows the user to check the value and > its wrong. > > So what I am asking is.....has anyone seen issues where RAM locations get > corrupted? The client can run it 9 or 10 times, works fine (power cycle) > but then it fails...and the other boars being built run just fine. Bad > chips? I find that hard to believe these days. > > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist