Look, I'm not attempting to lure anyone into anything. If I'm the only one who thinks the attitude toward beginners here is a little much and needs someone pulling in the other direction, then I'm clearly in the wrong place and I apologize and will move on to a different community that actually values people who are trying to get things done with technology, and not only people who are obsessed with the technology itself. I'm not asking anyone to moderate, or anyone to get banned or any of that crap, I'm just trying to provide a little balance. I think Olin can handle it. If he can't, then he REALLY should revisit the way he treats other people. But I'm confident he can and that everything will be just fine. On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Stephen D. Barnes wrote: > James Nick Sears wrote: >> And I knew this one was coming as well. I should just write an Olin >> simulator. Couldn't be more than a few hundred lines of code. >> >> And Olin, have YOU even looked at the datasheet? >> > > This may be OT but, I just have to speak up! I, and I hope others as > well, appreciate the consistent, and accurate info that Olin provides. > He has attempted to provide useful info concerning th OP's question > while minimizing issues brought about by different oscillator > strategies. He also has not engaged in any name calling. Please don't > attempt to lure anyone into another flame war. > Thanks > > -- > Regards, > Stephen D. Barnes > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist