>
> On Jun 3, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> Cedric Chang wrote:
>>> We know that even though he does a pretty good job as admin (even
>>> you want
>>> to come back!) he's not infallible, so I don't get all upset  
>>> about him
>>> falling out of line about as much as I or any other average member
>>> does.
>>> The job as admin is not to be perfect, but to keep the peace. Which
>>> works
>>> quite well with 99.9% of the list members (as Jake has calculated :)
>>>
>>
>> That 99.9% is not believable.  What did you do, compare all the list
>> members who ever existed versus those who complained ?  Try comparing
>> list members who post versus those who complain.  The percentage is
>> more like 80% satisfied.
>> cc
>>
>>
>>> Gerhard
>>>
> The list has about 2000 members?
> Russell is the only other person who has caused this much controversy,
> 2/2000 = 99.9%
> Russell also modified his behaviour (perhaps "just enough") and all is
> well now.
> (it helps that he wasn't calling people names)

I thinks your statistics stinks.... highly questionable.
Lies, damn lies and statistics.
- Mark Twain
cc

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist