> The wireless signal are energy (doesn't matter it's 
> digital signal or analog signal), if you keep receive the 
> energy or in the energy filed in a long time, it will have 
> some affect.

Yes and no.
The egg cooking story suggested a gross thermal effect - and 
the energy levels are liable to be far too low for that.

When it comes to more subtle health effects then waveforms 
may matter. A digital signal may have much higher 
instantaneous field strengths for the same mean power as 
analog. The GSM system (common here and in Europe) has a low 
frequency derived signal which is massively invasive in 
nearby electronic system - it is audible on stereo and other 
systems with no formal RF reception capability at all. It is 
not hard to imagine (possibly incorrectly) such lower 
frequency signals having a distinctly different biological 
effect than VHF/SHF ones - for better otr worse.

> It is how micro-ware oven works, just in different 
> frequency (2.4G Hz). Some cell phone use 900MHz, some 
> use1.8~1.9GHz. It depends on which country you are in.

That's true for thermal effects, as above. There can be, 
also as above, more subtle effects.



        Russell


> Whereas, the suggestions about possible links between
> various brain carcinoma and cell phone use may give one
> pause for thought,

Black joke intended:

> depending on how much you've been using a
> cellphone.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist