> > On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:57 PM, spam@maksimov.org wrote: > > Quoting Paul Hutchinson : >> >>> Speaking of abolishing the FCC. If you build a gadget that emits EMI >>> and interferes with the normal operation of someone else's device -- >>> is it their problem because "they made it too sensitive"? >> >> If your device is emitting above the FCC limits it's your problem, >> if it's >> emitting below the limits it's their problem. > > Are you guys deliberately missing the point? :) > > Cedric's position can be summarized as, "every wolf for himself". Sorry, V that is not my position. cc > My point is, "rules are necessary", for both humans and RF devices to > coexist. I honestly do not understand how something so seemingly > obvious and common knowledge can be the topic of debate. > > Vitaliy -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist