I personally find the list to be far less valuable since Olin's
participation has diminished.  I watched it all go down months (and
years) ago, and I must say that I am completely in sympathy with the
idea of restoring him to full un-censored participation.

Regards,

  Foster


> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On
Behalf
> Of PAUL James
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:58 PM
> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
> Subject: [ADMIN]: Question about member
> 
> Admins,
> 
> I don't want to start a feud, and I'm trying to be helpful here, so
bear
> with me.
> 
> I have spoken to Olin Lathrop recently, and he feels that he is
getting
> treated in ways that the general population isn't.
> 
> I'm not sure what has happened to make him feel this way, but in my
> opinion, from talking to him recently and based on past posts by him,
> he has a lot of expertise to offer the list population.   And if in
fact
> he is being treated differently than other members, couldn't bygones
be
> bygones,
> and treat him like anyone else, and let him contribute to the list?
> 
> Again, I'm not trying to cause a feud.  I'm just trying to understand
> what is going on, and asking that a member be treated like any other,
> and allow
> him to be a member in good standing, and contribute to a hugh resource
> for the PIC comminuty.
> 
> I firmly believe that the PICLIST is a case of synergy if ever there
was
> one.  Every contributor adds just that much more.  And the more
> contributors,
> the more resources we have to pull from.
> 
> Anyway, please consider my request.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> 
> Jim
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist