William "Chops" Westfield wrote:
> Well, that depends on what you do.  The rhetoric here is that it can
> be very easy in C++ to use a construct that has a very high
> performance impact without it being at all obvious at the sorce
> level, not that the C++ compiler is inherently less efficient on
> simply programs...

Bill, do you have experience with C++ on PICs? It seems to me that the 
dsPICs and the new PIC32s have enough umph to make the tradeoff 
worthwhile...

Vitaliy 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist