When I originally ported it from the F872 to F913, I remember there were
changes to be made due to the different memory maps and overlapping RAM
areas, oscillator setup changes (to use internal osc now), disabling the LCD
driver, some EE read/write code changes, and I now had to use ANSEL, etc. 

Now though, from the F913 to the F883, this is a brief summary of what I
changed...
	- Changed PIC type & include file.
	- Changed configuration bits (split into _CONFIG1,2, added _LVP_OFF).
	- Removed LCD init code.
	- Changed CMCON initializations.
	- Changed A/D inits (ADCON0, ADCON1).
	- Changed ANSEL, ANSELH inits.
	- Added VRCON init (off).
	- Changed other initis due to different banks.

There were no more RAM changes to be made now though.  The _LVP_OFF is what
solved the issue.

Cheers,
-Neil.



Alan B. Pearce wrote:
> 
> When you say 'ported', what did you need to change? They appear to have 
> significantly different SRF maps, that would be intolerant of missed bank 
> register selects on the 883, where RAM is mirrored in banks 2 & 3 on the 
> 872.
> 
>>From what you are saying, it sounds like there are assumptions in your
code 
> about where the RAM is, and the code goes into hyper space as a result. 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-PIC--Issues-porting-code-to-16F883-tp17267989p17291680.html
Sent from the PIC - [EE] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist