>Anyone here used the 16F883 or any 16F88x yet?  I had an 16F872 application
>that I ported to the 16F913 a year or so ago, and now I want to port that 
>to
>the 16F883 (lower cost, and I don't need the LCD drivers).

When you say 'ported', what did you need to change? They appear to have 
significantly different SRF maps, that would be intolerant of missed bank 
register selects on the 883, where RAM is mirrored in banks 2 & 3 on the 
872.

>From what you are saying, it sounds like there are assumptions in your code 
about where the RAM is, and the code goes into hyper space as a result. 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist