On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 07:27 -0400, Olin Lathrop wrote:
> Robert P. Thille wrote:
> > So, there's no way to have cycle-accurate delays, via subroutine call,
> > in relocatable code.
> 
> Of course there is.  I noticed you only got one response so far, and it
> included incorrect information too.  There is more I would say about this if
> James wasn't playing childish games with my account so that all my messages
> have to be "approved" by censors before they make it to the list.

Hello Olin,

it is not a childish game.

What's the saying: you can't argue with results?

Aside from the recent "unquietness" due to the ambiguity of the EE tag,
I don't think anyone will disagree that this list has been remarkably
quiet of late. Perhaps it's coincidence.

I for one prefer how quiet the list has become, and therefore prefer the
status quo. 

Thanks, TTYL
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist