>> Maybe there will be minor glitches but I do not think we need to
>> worry about this one

The thing is that time_t is much more of an "internal" format than  
the two digit "year" that led to the Y2K "problems."  The number of  
programs that store binary time_t in a database is vanishingly small  
compared to the number of programs that stored "YY", and you could  
probably change the base year, or the increment, and 80% of programs  
wouldn't even notice...

BillW

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist