> I am not as familiar as I want to be on this topic and I'm > looking for > pointers. ;) My goal is to modify an electric cart to be > charged by solar > panels mounted on the cart's roof. The cart charging > circuitry requires a 48 > volt input and the maximum output of the solar panels (in > series) is 34V and > 7A. > What I need then is a converter that can handle about a > max of 5A output at > 48 volts. In my research, I'm drawn to a boost type > converter since I need a > constant and higher voltage output than the input voltage. > A boost converter > is also attractive because of its simplicity. Designing a > flyback type > converter would be more difficult for me, but I want > something that works > well! > > Can anyone give me pro/con about a boost topology > converter for this > application? If this is a one off then buy versus build needs to be considered. That's possibly "buy and modify" but you may still find that it's cheaper and easier to do that. Assuming build from scratch - This is in the capabilities of a single switch simple boost converter, although commercial solutions at this level may often use some form of push pull topology. You say the charging circuit needs 48V. Is that a 48V battery or a lower voltage battery with a charger that needs a higher voltage than the battery. That is an important question as it can severely affect the solution. If you want something that works with an existing 'black box' then optimum efficiency may not be the aim. if you want best energy use then more details of the whole system would be useful. eg xxx solar panel with N cells. Vmax = 34V (68 cells?)(unusual)(measured?) I max = 7A (measured)(short circuit?)(name plate?)... Assuming that the 34V is Voc in full sun then Voptimum (Vmpp) will be about 34 * (0.75 to 0.8) = 25 to 27V Assuming a 48V battery = 4 x 12V the required charge voltage will be more like 56 V. So step up will be say 25 to 48 ~= 2:1 A boost converter with the inductor "standing" on the 25V rail will need to produce another 25V or so. Efficiencies approaching 95% should be possible with care. On the input side power in (first cut) = say 25*7 = 175 Watts Question: What resistance in the primary side will cause 1% losses? 1% = 1.75W say 2W For 2W at 7A R = P/I^2 = 2/49 ~= 0.04 ohm. So per 1% primary loss you can have 40 milliohm for wiring, inductor, MOSFET (hot) and more. Secondary (boost mode losses) involve ~= 3.%A the wiring and 7A pulses in the inductor, diode and 50V reservoir capacitor Assuming Schottky diode and say 0.5V drop you get 7A x 0.5V x 50% = 1.75W say 2W losses or another 1%. If you are aiming at 95% overall and allow ~= 50% in input and out put sides you are allowed a total input equivalent resistance of about 2.5(%) x 40 milliohm = 100 milliohm. If the FET is half of this that's 50 milliohm. A FET with a real world 50 milliohm Rdson will need a spec sheet one of under 25 milliohm say 0.02 ohm as the spec sheets almost always quote pulsed values at very low duty cycles. FET rating needs to be say 20A, 50V (abs min, more better), <= 20 mohm Rdson. The IRFP064 is a good start. TO247 package. $6 Digikey Claimed 0.008 Rdson 55V 110A A bit more voltage would be advised! IXFH110N10P is a bit better and a bit dearer http://ixdev.ixys.com/DataSheet/99212.pdf http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=IRFP064NPBF-ND http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irfp064npbf.pdf I'll stop there. MUCH more can be said but lets see if we are going in the right direction for you. This and friends could be useful Note that Schottky diodes really really don't like over voltage - rate conservatively. http://www.vishay.com/docs/88941/v30100s.pdf Russell McMahon -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist