Vic Fraenckel wrote: > Several of us have been speculating on how to go about designing a target > system for a rifle range that did not use paper targets. Sort of a target > that could sense the passing of a bullet and determine it's location. We > assume a target that was 1 meter square and wish to determine the precise > position of the round as it passes through the square. If the shooter was > using an semi-automatic weapon, then the position of each round fired would > have to be recorded. The positioning would have to be fairly precise. Is > this sort of thing feasible? Ideas? > > Any enlightenment will be appreciated. > > Vic > > Not wanting to be negative, but....... Paper targets are cheap. And they give you something to aim at! I was in the service and recall how I got a score of 25 out of 20 shots fired. Our targets were placed several meters apart. The guy next to me was all over the place. One miss-placed hit on your nice sensor will buy a lot of paper targets! However, consider a paper target system with a camera registered against the target should be able to recognize the position of the round and record that. Use a light source to project the target image on the paper and you wouldn't need printed targets, just a roll of paper that can be advanced when needed. Jim -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist