Scott will not be pleased. Nor, if I understand him correctly, will Andrew
Warren, Nikolai Golovchenko, and Dmitriy Kiryashov. 

"...all Synaptics' employees like me but one time active Piclist
participants, refuse to spend any significant time on the Piclist. But we're
somewhat weird in that we tend to think towards simplicity rather than
complexity."

--
James.

-----Original Message-----
From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Apptech
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 18:13
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
Subject: Re: [OT] Proposal: Add another tag

> Ok, I'm not entirely against adding a new tag. I do have 
> several issues that
> need to be addressed:

"The admins ascend the crystal stairway to ... " ** :-)

I honestly think that this would be a truly positive step 
for the list.
I can see it providing an environment that people like eg 
Scott can live in without too many problems
eg I'd imagine that Scott with PIC and EE enabled would be 
happy enough.
As ever, I may be wrong.

It seems to offer a clarity that has been absent (to we the 
dim of eye and brain), a separation of key vital areas and 
an ability for people to tailor content without tags getting 
so finely divided that the brain explodes. While there are a 
number of "sub tags" such as SX AVR etc these are both so 
little used AND well enough known to people who care that 
most people will not be bothered by them. The "main 
sequence" of
PIC EE ENG* OT
should be clear enough to most (he says hopefully)


        Russell




* or whatever is used.

** I was interested to note that only Xiaofan made any 
mention of this whatsoever ;-)


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist