I largely agree with you, this is a good thing. Many people learn better by seeing than reading, and some projects just call out for a video or audio. I hope, however, that it is redundant - you should still be able to get the same information from the print article as you get in the video and audio. I hate that CNN has a bunch of interesting stories that are video only, with no transcript. I hope it gets as cheap and easy (actually, cheaper and easier) to document projects using pictures, video, audio, etc as it is to throw a webpage up. There are doubtlessly tons of interesting work happening that could be put on the web in a multitude of formats that isn't simply because it requires significant time and money. -Adam On 4/4/08, Clint Sharp wrote: > In message > <597d9df90804041517h487ad6d3k93f842b835a3557d@mail.gmail.com>, Dave > Lagzdin writes > >On 04/04/2008, cdb wrote: > >Anybody besides me HATE this idea? > >That has to be THE most annoying form for a magazine... > It's not the *whole* magazine, it's supplemental to the print/PDF > magazine and I think it's a great idea. > > > >Dave > > -- > Clint Sharp > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moving in southeast Michigan? Buy my house: http://ubasics.com/house/ Interested in electronics? Check out the projects at http://ubasics.com Building your own house? Check out http://ubasics.com/home/ -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist