>> > What other fully & truly scientifically TREATABLE 
>> > subject
>> > when truly and fully scientifically TREATED is 
>> > disallowed
>> > for discussion here?

>>>> >>> Let the book burning commence / continue ?

> If it was an ENGINEERING subject that might qualify it, 
> but if it is
> SCIENTIFIC bordering on POLITICAL and RELIGIOUS, please 
> take it OT.

> Note that EE subject is for EVERYTHING ENGINEERING so 
> unless you have a
> process for engineering the planet take your theories OT.

> Wow, I think I made that fairly clear!

Absolutely clear.
You have refined science as religion in an area that you 
wish it to be so.

[EE] by all past definitions includes science.
This is the science of planetary climate.
It's not that it's hard (which is is) but that it's being 
done at all levels with blatant dishonesty, appeal to 
emotion, bullying, name calling (literally) and Cant.  How 
can this subject possibly NOT be science?

Questions:

- What are the factors that affect climate?
- How significant is each relatively?
- How much impact will the things we are doing have?
- Might we push things past a point of no return at the 
current rate before we find out the 1st 3 answers?
- What should we do in the mean time?

1 - 4 are Science
5 is policy and politics which can be  informed by Science

5 by itself with fake religious pretence to be addressing 
the other points is religion.


        Russell


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist