Not overly pertinent to the larger theme of the thread, but to some 'subtexts'. > How do you feel about Occams razor ? > ( Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a > principle > attributed to the 14th-century English logician and > Franciscan friar > William of Ockham ) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor When seeking to apply Occams razor to a subject care is needed to not mistake what it is intended to mean compared to the many subtle and not so subtle variants that hjave arisen that can say quite different things. In essence Occams Razor is the opinion that "If there are a number of theories that are equally good at apparently explaining an observation you may as well use the simplest one initially". - This is only an opinion (although it may be a useful one). - It does not say that there is any indication that the theory you choose has a better chance of being right than others (although it may). Simplicity is often an indicator of elegance. But sometimes its mainly just an indicator of simplicity. __________ > The U.S. is indeed controlled by a facist regime. > see definition > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism The part of ther articel that is most appropriate [IMHO [tm]] in this context is the term fascist is often a slur, used by adherents of some ideologies to describe their opponents ie while there are a number of elements of the definition that match quite well, the difference between the current US system, notwithstanding it's apparent directions and the undoubted failings that it does have, and that implemented by eg Benito Musslini are as day and night respectively. While there are many in the US who may SEEK to be Fascist, who wish to be Fascist and who work against the directions of democracy as a whole, Mussolinis system had none of the remedies available to the US citizenry at present. _______________ >> Anyhow, you would be bored to death if you where to wait >> for any >> building to >> collapse because of fire! >> Engineers know that rolled metal has something that is >> called a >> 'benign mode >> of failure'! that is things bend before they fail! that >> takes >> energy and >> time! Haven't seen other building fires that burned much >> longer? >> And now the >> worlds first 3 highrises that fail just like controlled >> demolitions >> do! Some while ago I read through engineering comments on the 'tube and shell' design of theWTC buildings. Included in the available material was the original designers comments on how substantially different it was from what had been done in all but a few cases and gave a good idea of how advanced they thought the scheme was. I conclude that comparisons with other types of construction are less apposite than may be apparent. I have not overly concerned myself with the details of the conspiracy theories*over the WTC events. There are many capable intelligent people doing that already. I have read enough to believe that there are grave doubts either way but that simplistic "it must be right because of these facts ..." explanations are far from certain. I would not be overly surprised if the government-complicity theories are correct, but I would be rather less surprised if they are not. Such things are really beyond the certain determination of anyone who is not prepared to make it their life's mission to find the truth. But, fwiw, Occam says that, for now, you may as well assume that OBL & co did it as claimed. Russell [[*Note that conspiracy theories may or may not be correct - the term is not a perjorative although it is usually used that way. For example, not too many years ago some conspiracy theorists started talking about secret international flights of small long range aircraft between the US and other nations on top secret government business which was alleged to involved the transportation of prosioners to locations where they could be interviewed or tortured or killed without the protection and limitations of US law. Such material was "conspiracy theory" of the wildest sort. It is now public knowledge that the theories were correct.]] -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist