> Few subjects on the OT 'PIC' list are provable. Henceforth 
> the 'OT' tag
> shall thus be abolished.

PLUS

Few subjects on the [PIC] tag are provable, assertions re 
factuality of content in Microchip data sheets, 
notwithstanding.
Henceforth the [PIC] tag shall be retired.

AND

Few subjects on the [EE] tag are provable, most of reality 
being based on probabilitic assertions hiding under the 
guise of Qantum Mechanical indeterminism, notwithstanding. 
Henceforth the [EE] tag shall be disbanded.

AND

Few ...

SO

[AVR] Rulez! Yay!

Huh. Wazzat you say. 2 days late? OK, next year then.


        R



> -
> Martin
>
> James Newton wrote:
>> Russell is correct here in that David made a statement 
>> which is un-provable
>> and there for religious in it's own right: While Russell 
>> can not (please
>> don't try? Please?) prove that religions DO provide real 
>> goods, David also
>> can not possibly prove that they do NOT provide real 
>> goods.
>>
>> This is exactly the sort of discussion that is prohibited 
>> on the list.
>> Un-provable statements are not to be discussed here.
>>
>> The point about priests dining on sacrifice might be 
>> provable...
>>
>> No more yelling, flaming, or moaning about this subject.
>>
>> --
>> James Newton, PICList admin.
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist