> Because this somehow makes me think of the denial > of global warming by the US government some time ago. The connection with ROHS is'nt obvious. Care to elaborate? best regards, Jack On 3/26/08, Apptech wrote: > >> >> ROHS Roll back the lead-free initiative 12 ROHS > >> >> myths - > >> >> 9-13-2007 - EDN > >> >> http://www.edn.com/article/CA6477864.html > >> > >> > Just take note that the study is by U.S. Environmental > >> > Protection Agency (EPA) > >> > >> Why? > > > > Because this somehow makes me think of the denial > > of global warming by the US government some time ago. > > You'll need to explain that if you want to make your point > clear. > > Are you for example suggesting that the EPA are an arm or > tool of the US government and are used to implement > government policy? If you are then I would imagine that you > are not overly familiar with the EPA :-). > > Have you skimmed or even looked at the report or summaries? > > If the reports provided 'data' which lead one to conclude > that ROHS caused a net increase in global warming (and this > is probably what it does provide) would you conclude that > the motives of the report preparers are ideologically > influenced towards supporting the government's position? > > > R > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist