On 20 Mar 2008 at 9:48, Gerhard Fiedler wrote: > Vitaliy wrote: > = > > Gerhard Fiedler wrote: > >> [...] It probably pre-dates most of the Christian (totalitarian) roots > >> our culture is based on. > > = > > Gerhard, I'd like to point out that.. > > = > > Christian !=3D totalitarian > > = > > ..and some people on this list may find your comment offensive. I don't= see = > > how your comment is different from calling someone's beliefs "fascist". > > = > > As "religious" debates are forbidden, I only ask you to refrain from si= milar = > > comments in the future. > = > I thought I might have to explain this. This is not about religion, this = is > about history (notice the expression "roots our culture is based on", > indicating a quite long history, not just a lifetime or two). = > = > Almost from its very inception as a formal religion in the 4th century, > Christianity intimately connected itself to totalitarian regimes, and > actively participated in justifying their existence. See it becoming the > Roman official state religion, see the "Heilige R=F6mische Reich Deutscher > Nation", or the Anglican Church. While large parts of the Protestant > Reformation split from this pattern, in terms of historic and cultural > roots this is fairly recent, and wasn't a mainstream movement for quite > some time. Looking over two thousand years of Christian history, you'll s= ee > most of its major leaders quite intimately linked to totalitarian regimes > and actively involved with the justification of their existence and power. > Democracy (as principle, not a form of government) is still not a strong > trait of at least the Catholic branch of Christianity (see e.g. the histo= ry > of Liberation theology). > = > So while you are correct that Christian !=3D totalitarian, you are wrong = in > implying that I said Christian =3D=3D totalitarian. But that they are > historically (again, note the word "roots") intimately linked is IMO a > fact. > = > With this I don't (and didn't intend to) say anything about the Christian > faith itself or today's practicing Christians. I was talking about history > (and historic facts), not religion, and I didn't call anybody's beliefs > anything (not fascist, not totalitarian, nor anything else). > = > If you think I got my facts wrong, please correct if you so wish. > = > Gerhard > = > -- = Just to add some wood to the fire: http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm MJ -- = http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist