> On Feb 29, 2008, at 10:40 PM, William Chops Westfield wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 29, 2008, at 8:55 PM, Cedric Chang wrote:
>
>> I assumed that the rebate was taxpayer financed.
> 	:
>>  I assumed 4% opportunity cost.  At 6% , your profit is
>> -3,103.30 ( a loss ).  at 10% your loss is $8,292.14.
>
> Did you remember to go back to the rebated cost when calculating
> the cost of the "lost opportunity" ?  Even if tax-payer financed,
> James would (presumably) only had the ~$13k to invest rather than
> the ~$21k...
>
> BillW

Don't know what you mean.....
cc

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist