What's wrong with asking why it works? Could be good to know when it no
longer works. And if it's the "proper" way to go.

Wed



2008/2/29, Rikard Bosnjakovic <rikard.bosnjakovic@gmail.com>:
>
> On 28/02/2008, Andre Abelian <aabelian@mason-electric.com> wrote:
>
> >  I used HSPLL instead of ECPLL to program some boards that it is too
> late
> >  to open them. HS is for crystal and EC is for external clock. HS works
> for both.
> >  Does any one know why HSPLL works for both and it is safe to use it.
>
>
> What boards?
>
> And I'm a bit confused. If HS works for both, why asking why it works
> for both? Are you talking about PIC-chips or complete set of
> demo-boards? Or, what are you really asking? We have no clue.
>
>
>
> --
> - Rikard - http://bos.hack.org/cv/
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist