On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Chris Smolinski wrote:

> >  > I'm all for setting up a few locations across the US where many
> >>  nuclear reactors are placed. Near enough to major population centers
> >>  to be where the loads are, far enough away for a buffer zone. Set up
> >>  restricted airspace around them.
> >
> >That's what I'm thinking.. We already have a lot of the security
> >infrastructure there, and it makes some sense to combine the
> >functions.  In case of a problem, the base probably remains powered
> >up, which is a good thing.
> >
> >Since a lot of the folks responsible for the security and operations
> >would be essentially living at the plant, I would think that they
> >would take a serious interest.
> 
> That's an excellent point. If your wife and kids are living there, 
> you're going to be extra careful.

You are projecting your feeling and ideals on other people. If everyone 
felt like you there would be no wife beating husbands or child beating 
fathers. Don't expect others to be more careful because you would be. Some 
people will still see it as just another job.

Regards
Sergio
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist