> We've been storing nuclear waste of one sort or another for close
> to 60 years now.  That should be something of a case study.  As
> far as I know, the (known) ecological consequences have been less
> than those from conventional mining of various sorts, or even
> farmland construction via rain forest destruction.  (and perhaps
> less than the results of burning 60y worth of fossil fuels.)

Well there are those hot frogs on the loose..  :)

But I'm inclined to agree, and again the radioactives released by
natural gas and coal might be even more than the nuke plants in total,
and they are ignored.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist