'Yes, really ' ..... since I have no definition.  I am content if the  
highest
bidder gets to supply his or her definition. And then the next highest
bidder supplies his/her definition.
Recursively

If you love democracy, you will love this solution.  If you love  
command and control, you will find this approach detestable.  ( note  
that logic says " if A ---> B , B does not necessarily imply A. )

cc

> On Feb 26, 2008, at 5:19 AM, Chris Smolinski wrote:
>
> Not really, since you want to raise water prices until your  
> definition is met.
>
>> My solution takes care of ---> 'There's the rub - everyone has a
>> different definition of "most effectively".'
>> cc
>>
>>>
>>>  On Feb 25, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Chris Smolinski wrote:
>>>
>>>  There's the rub - everyone has a different definition of "most
>>>  effectively".
>>>
>>>>  It is so simple. Raise the price of water and keep raising it  
>>>> until
>>>>  water is being used most effectively.  Why issue pleas unless
>>>>  politicians think that is cool and shows they care. ?
>>>>  cc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:51 PM, John Gardner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Makes too much sense - Out walking in the rain
>>>>  yesterday (So much for sense) one can't help
>>>>  noticing all the lawn sprinklers going full blast,
>>>>  while their owners sit inside in front of the tube
>>>>  listening to pleas from the authorities to limit
>>>>  water use - We're in a drought here in SoCal,
>>>>  despite the recent weather.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>
>
> -- 
>
> ---
> Chris Smolinski
> Black Cat Systems
> http://www.blackcatsystems.com
>
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist