> I learned that the missile was non-explosive - they needed 
> a direct
> hit with a chunk of metal, rather than a fly-near with an 
> explosive -
> much more impressive with a satellite moving at 17,000mph.
>
> Given the action and expense they took, I have a hard time 
> believing
> it was just for show, toxic fuel, or even sensitive 
> components.  I
> wonder if they blew up a shell, and the real (stealth) 
> satellite is
> still out there...
>
> Love conspiracy theories.

Best believable theory is (IMHO) that it was a capability 
demonstration, both to themselves, and to those who they 
wish to demonstrate that they have the capability. "Don't 
bother putting up a satellite to cover the area, if we don't 
want it there it can be disappeared on cue ...".


        Russell

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist