I agree with both statements. However, there's no time to re-write the 
assembly code I've already done, in a language I'm not currently that 
hot on. I would obviously prefer to use regular mathematical expressions 
in future, instead of bit twiddling.

Matt


Herbert Graf wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:53 -0700, Bob Axtell wrote:
>   
>> These complex routines are the EXACT reason why I am using higher 
>> languages for some projects.
>> It is worth paying $200+ to know that these routines have been 
>> thoroughly rung out...
>>     
>
> Unfortunately sometimes you still end up with routines that don't work
> quite just right... (to be fair, math routine usually are fine, but
> peripheral libraries can be another story...).
>
> TTYL
>
>
>   
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist