On 2/1/08, Martin Klingensmith wrote: > I had my place of employment get a license for our use. There was > nothing else in the price range that compares with it, IMO. There is a free one, with equal (poor) features as Eagle, on the yahoo forums, made by a french, I don't remember now the name, do a search. The > open-source solutions are interesting, but not there yet. Maybe in a few > years. Once you spend a few days with it you learn the obscurities. > There aren't many gripes that I can think of at the moment. The labeling > of nets to connect across sheets is a bit of a kludge, and I wish the > net (wire) drawing tool was smarter, but neither of those are things to > make me dislike the program in general. > We didn't buy the autorouter, and I don't miss it. Half of what I do is > analog anyway. I'd say for relatively small boards, Eagle is a good buy. > If you're making an 8 layer motherboard, something else is definitely > better. > Martin > > Bob Blick wrote: > > I'm glad they continue to improve it. I imagine it'll be pretty nice > > right about the time the value of the dollar makes it unaffordable :) > > > > Cheerful regards, > > > > Bob > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist