M. Adam Davis wrote:

> Keep in mind that when 95 was released people had the same reaction -
> 3.1 is faster, more stable, and everyone was used to it.

I'm sorry but I feel like disagreeing on this - if my memory serves me well.
It was a big leap towards (though bad years for me :) )

I don't disagree with your other points, of course.

> Vista is as different from XP/2k as 95 was from 3.1 - this is a bigger

This might be true: but 95 brought "good" and useful things, while Vista 
just brings eye-candy and User-Passwords with just drive crazy us who 
work with the PC.

-- 
Ciao, Dario
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist