> You forgot this:
> "This power gain is caused by additional energy being 
> drawn from the
> immediate environment..."

> That energy must cause a reduction in temperature in the 
> immediate environment,
> so we have air conditioning

So far so good. That is, after all what heat pumps and 
air-conditioners do.

A heat pump is about the closest thing to perpetual motion 
that actually works. I've never yet seen an explanation of 
the process that is intuitively comfortable. You can explain 
it with simple thermodynamic equations. But turning it into 
common sense seems another matter. By all means someone do a 
good job of explaining it in simple terms. But be sure to 
explain intuitively at the same time why an electric heater 
cannot pedestal on the same base heat source that the pump 
does. [[Y' pick the bucket load of heat energy out of the 
well here and stick it up here and it gets this much hotter. 
So far so good. But you calculate the COP based on pulling 
the whole slice up, all the way from absolute zero, and 
standing it on local ambient. COP = Tamb_ab/Tdelat. So far 
so good. BUT the energy taken to do this is only, ... 
oops. ]]

But

> and solve global warming too.... ;)

(and I know the comment wasn't serious) - it's a zero sum 
game - so unless you can keep the warming and the cooling 
apart you get nowhere.



        Russell


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist