> In summary it would exceedingly difficult to coopt 
> someone on the inside to steal plutonium,

If that is too difficult, get it with force

> get it to the 
> terrorists without it being noted as missing

why cares if it is noticed or not? being noticed might be part of the
scheme.

> then to 
> actually make a useful explosive device from it.

from a terrorist point of view even a conventional explosive what
spreads plutonium is very 'useful'.

> Even then 
> the yield would not be that devestating even if you could 
> pull it all off.

I don't care whether the yield it let's say 1/10 of a conventional bom.
Especially not after it exploded near me.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist